Chinese Corporate Spying Case is Just the Tip of the Iceberg
Bloomberg Law released on March 19, 2012 my interview regarding the Economic Espionage Act.
2 Comments
As seen on
My Firm
My Book
Intellectual Property and Computer Crimes by Peter Toren
"A must-have desk reference.... A practical all-in-one legal resource on intellectual property and computer crimes...." — The Vermont Bar Journal
Recent Media Mentions
- "Lawyers Weigh In On Supreme Court's Monsanto Ruling," (Law360, May 13, 2013).
- "Ban On Chinese IT Creates Contracting Headaches," (Law360, May 10, 2013).
- "Cyber Financial Extortion: The big business problem no one wants to talk about," (HackSurfer, May 10, 2013).
- "Experts Weigh In: What are your top cybersecurity concerns?" (HackSurfer, June 2, 2013).
- "Cyber Barrage On Utilities Unlikely To Stir Congress," (Law360, May 23, 2013).
- "Snooping Outcry May Push Verizon, Others To Fight NSA Orders," (Law360, June 6, 2013).
- "Chinese Suspected in Hacking Infrastructure: Real cyberwar or just fear mongering? " (HackSurfer, May 8, 2013).
- "Obama, Xi, Congress talk cybersecurity; does it matter?" (fedscoop, June 7, 2013).
- "Narrow Monsanto Patent Ruling Ducks Self-Replication Issue," (Law360, May 13, 2013).
- "Bloomberg's Terminal Snooping May Draw Criminal Charges," (Law360, May 14, 2013).
- "Snowden triggers scrutiny on secret access," (Fresno Bee, June 12, 2013).
- "ITC Slaps Apple in Samsung Infringement Case," (TechNewsWorld, June 6, 2013).
- "Will the 113th Congress succeed on cybersecurity where the 112th failed?" (fedscoop, May 30, 2013).
- "AP Records Seizure Fuels Push To Limit Gov't Snooping," (May 16, 2013).
- "NSA's Internet Spying May Prompt Belated Lawmaker Backlash," (Law360, June 7, 2013).
- "Texas Email Privacy Bill Could Prod States, Feds," (Law360, May 29, 2013).
- "Cellphone Search Confusion Begs For High Court Review," (Law360, May 2, 2013).
Peter, enjoyed your article and your observation about a federal copyright claim that could have, and in retrospect, should have been pursued. Are you familiar with any other decisions construing the “produced for” commerce under 1832(a)? My initial reaction is that the Second Circuit applied an unduly narrow construction of that language, but I would be very interested in your thoughts.
Best wishes, John
My life…
[...]The information mentioned inside the article are several of the best available [...]…